home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: pacbell.com!well!usenet
- From: Tim Arnold <yimmit@well.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Java? Was: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 13:11:56 -0800
- Organization: The WELL
- Message-ID: <3119159C.531D@well.com>
- References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <Pine.SUN.3.90.960126125658.2477C-100000@menger.eecs.stevens-tech.edu> <sundial.2191.00464727@primenet.com> <DLvxyq.62w@news.hawaii.edu> <4et3p7$79o@cloud9.net> <823335327.28831@williaj.demon.co.uk> <mac.318.3115D621@zeus.hsrc.ac.za>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cust47.max19.new-york.ny.ms.uu.net
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I)
-
- > - Java is a full compiler that produces .EXE files using a language that is
- > C++-like in syntax but with less indeterminacies and a single-inheritance
- > object hierarchy.
-
- I wish. No .exe files, only .class files which the Java interperter understands. This the idea
- behind portability.
-